Message130476
| Author | giampaolo.rodola |
|---|---|
| Recipients | George.Dhoore, SilentGhost, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, pitrou |
| Date | 2011-03-09.23:21:12 |
| SpamBayes Score | 4.2136685e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1299712873.92.0.434848599681.issue11072@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
You're right about r/strip(), thanks (new patch in attachment). > In your test you're checking whether returned facts > contain every requested fact, this is not guaranteed by RFC. Yes, but we're using a dummy FTP server returning static MLSD_DATA, so this is not important. > Also, not sure what the last for statement > is supposed to mean. Is it a typo? It makes sure whether in case of directory empty (see: no data returned) we don't enter in the "for" block. Probably it's not even necessary because this is already tested by: self.assertRaises(StopIteration, next, self.client.mlsd()) ...but... whathever. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-03-09 23:21:14 | giampaolo.rodola | set | recipients: + giampaolo.rodola, pitrou, eric.smith, SilentGhost, George.Dhoore |
| 2011-03-09 23:21:13 | giampaolo.rodola | set | messageid: <1299712873.92.0.434848599681.issue11072@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-03-09 23:21:13 | giampaolo.rodola | link | issue11072 messages |
| 2011-03-09 23:21:12 | giampaolo.rodola | create | |