Message130553
| Author | sandro.tosi |
|---|---|
| Recipients | docs@python, orsenthil, sandro.tosi, techtonik |
| Date | 2011-03-11.09:53:17 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.385533e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1299837198.67.0.568132173375.issue11009@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Hi Senthil, what do you think about "documenting" those methods are private ones in the urllib code (if not using _, at least a short comment above them)? at least we have a mark it's an implementation decision and in case someone has the crazy idea :) to scan the module to fill in the missing methods in the doc, he'd know they are not to be exposed. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-03-11 09:53:18 | sandro.tosi | set | recipients: + sandro.tosi, orsenthil, techtonik, docs@python |
| 2011-03-11 09:53:18 | sandro.tosi | set | messageid: <1299837198.67.0.568132173375.issue11009@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-03-11 09:53:17 | sandro.tosi | link | issue11009 messages |
| 2011-03-11 09:53:17 | sandro.tosi | create | |