Message130714
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Trundle, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, loewis, neologix, nvetoshkin, pitrou, socketpair, terry.reedy, torsten |
| Date | 2011-03-12.23:47:23 |
| SpamBayes Score | 2.7166025e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1299973641.3702.122.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1299973501.23.0.232711689178.issue11406@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I would like to have an iterator version as well, but I also dislike > another function (especially the "x" prefix). How about adding a > keyword argument to select iterator behaviour? Changing the return type based on an argument is generally frown upon so, if anything, I think it would be better to have a separate function (whatever its name). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-03-12 23:47:24 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, loewis, terry.reedy, giampaolo.rodola, eric.araujo, Trundle, brian.curtin, torsten, nvetoshkin, neologix, socketpair |
| 2011-03-12 23:47:23 | pitrou | link | issue11406 messages |
| 2011-03-12 23:47:23 | pitrou | create | |