Message 130950 - Python tracker

Message130950

Author	Trundle
Recipients	Trundle, belopolsky, brett.cannon, cool-RR, giampaolo.rodola, gruszczy, loewis, nedbat, r.david.murray, techtonik, vstinner
Date	2011-03-15.03:58:52
SpamBayes Score	2.2956643e-05
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<AANLkTinNu_OamT-u2Rt6O6L6EeUdGOjVYpmZYNm2Seoy@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1299498559.18.0.816626930459.issue1559549@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> I am sorry again for those mistakes, it's all completely new to me. No worries! >I have fixed those issues and created new patch. Using hg export, that now spans over two commits. Is it the way those patches should be provided, or should I gather all changes into a one commit? A single patch (where all changesets are flattened into one) is the preferred way. For general advice, you can read the Developer's Guide at http://docs.python.org/devguide/ (e.g. http://docs.python.org/devguide/patch.html).

Content

> I am sorry again for those mistakes, it's all completely new to me.

No worries!

>I have fixed those issues and created new patch. Using hg export, that now spans over two commits. Is it the way those patches should be provided, or should I gather all changes into a one commit?

A single patch (where all changesets are flattened into one) is the
preferred way. For general advice, you can read the Developer's Guide
at http://docs.python.org/devguide/ (e.g.
http://docs.python.org/devguide/patch.html).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-03-15 03:58:53	Trundle	set	recipients: + Trundle, loewis, brett.cannon, belopolsky, vstinner, techtonik, giampaolo.rodola, nedbat, r.david.murray, gruszczy, cool-RR
2011-03-15 03:58:52	Trundle	link	issue1559549 messages
2011-03-15 03:58:52	Trundle	create