Message 131787 - Python tracker

Message131787

Author	belopolsky
Recipients	belopolsky, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, glingl, gregorlingl, gvanrossum, ned.deily, r.david.murray, rhettinger, terry.reedy
Date	2011-03-22.21:26:13
SpamBayes Score	0.0008526816
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<AANLkTimzo=OQG5FtxWWJX-xrUtK4ZNqO=4YTPBhyTJhU@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1300828555.92.0.369236671347.issue10291@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Éric Araujo <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: >.. > The patch contains one unrelated code change. > Yes, I noticed that, but it may not be that unrelated. Of course the two changes need to be committed separately, but the pop-under issue (issue11571) affects turtledemo in the same way as turtle. > I think the docstrings should not go as is but be cleaned up to match docstrings conventions. > I’ve also spotted some phrasing issues. I would rather keep code and documentation changes separate. Not that we have any strict docstrings conventions. :-)

Content

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Éric Araujo <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>..
> The patch contains one unrelated code change.
>

Yes, I noticed that, but it may not be that unrelated.  Of course the
two changes need to be committed separately, but the pop-under issue
(issue11571) affects turtledemo in the same way as turtle.

> I think the docstrings should not go as is but be cleaned up to match docstrings conventions.
>  I’ve also spotted some phrasing issues.

I would rather keep code and documentation changes separate.  Not that
we have any strict  docstrings conventions. :-)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-03-22 21:26:15	belopolsky	set	recipients: + belopolsky, gvanrossum, georg.brandl, rhettinger, terry.reedy, glingl, gregorlingl, ned.deily, eric.araujo, r.david.murray
2011-03-22 21:26:13	belopolsky	link	issue10291 messages
2011-03-22 21:26:13	belopolsky	create