Message131867
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | bquinlan, gregory.p.smith, jyasskin, pitrou, stutzbach |
| Date | 2011-03-23.13:40:19 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.011583308 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1300887616.3495.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1300873107.95.0.378653217804.issue11635@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Your approach seems workable but your patch allows the interpreter to > exit while work items are still being processed. See the comment at > the top of concurrent/futures/thread.py. Why are you saying that? In my patch, _python_exit() still takes care of joining worker threads. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-03-23 13:40:23 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, gregory.p.smith, bquinlan, jyasskin, stutzbach |
| 2011-03-23 13:40:19 | pitrou | link | issue11635 messages |
| 2011-03-23 13:40:19 | pitrou | create | |