Message134105
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | db3l, gregory.p.smith, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, rnk, sable, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-04-19.21:27:33 |
| SpamBayes Score | 3.7537723e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1303248451.3741.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1303247977.21240.15.camel@marge> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I also renamed 'name' key to 'thread', so 'thread' is the name of the > *thread* implementation, and 'lock' is the name of the *lock* > implementation. Not that I want to bikeshed, but I think 'name' was ok (since you get the dict by calling threading._info(), it's obvious it has to do with threading). 'lock_implementation' would be better than 'lock', OTOH. Also, the 'pthread_version' documentation should state that it is optional (only works on GNU). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-04-19 21:27:34 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, gregory.p.smith, db3l, vstinner, sable, rnk, neologix, python-dev |
| 2011-04-19 21:27:33 | pitrou | link | issue11223 messages |
| 2011-04-19 21:27:33 | pitrou | create | |