Message134379
| Author | sdaoden |
|---|---|
| Recipients | nadeem.vawda, neologix, pitrou, ronaldoussoren, santoso.wijaya, sdaoden, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-04-25.11:39:09 |
| SpamBayes Score | 3.1205833e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <20110425113859.GA38742@sherwood.local> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I'll attach 11877.4.diff:
- Docu change (i hope to be better)
- Kept NetBSD after looking into
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c?rev=1.423&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&only_with_tag=MAIN
because fsync_range() with FDISKSYNC set causes a FSYNC_CACHE
flag to be passed through to VOP_FSYNC() in addition to
FSYNC_WAIT, which is what plain fsync() passes exclusively.
(I have not furtherly discovered that. FDISKSYNC was introduced
2005. I believe existence of such a flag will sooner or later
force somebody to make a difference in wether it is set or not.)
- Drop of AIX. According to the systems manual (link in
msg134213) there does not seem to be a difference in between
fsync() and fsync_range()
- Drop of Linux sync_file_range() (see messages above).
By the way, does Linux still require |
|
| Files | |
|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded |
| 11877.4.diff | sdaoden, 2011-04-25.11:39:08 |
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-04-25 11:39:10 | sdaoden | set | recipients: + sdaoden, ronaldoussoren, pitrou, vstinner, nadeem.vawda, neologix, santoso.wijaya |
| 2011-04-25 11:39:09 | sdaoden | link | issue11877 messages |
| 2011-04-25 11:39:09 | sdaoden | create | |