Message135499
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, exarkun, gregory.p.smith, loewis, marcin.bachry, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, schmichael, spiv, tseaver, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-05-07.19:38:05 |
| SpamBayes Score | 9.3394465e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1304797083.3526.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1304762460.2.0.823890484797.issue8407@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> pending_signals-3.patch: > - don't check for pending signals in sigwait() > - pthread_kill() doc: it is not a good idea to say that pthread_kill() with signum=0 can be used to check if a thread identifier is valid => such test does crash (SIGSEGV) on my Linux box. I changed the doc to say that it can be used to check if a thread is still running (which is different). > - add a dedicated test for sigpending() > - doc: explain how to get a thread identifier for pthread_kill() > - don't compile pthread_kill() without threads: you cannot get a valid thread identifier without the _thread module > > I think that the patch is ready to be commited. Anyone for a last > review? (antoine, neologix?) It looks good to me. It's very nice to have all these extra functions :) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-05-07 19:38:07 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, loewis, gregory.p.smith, spiv, exarkun, tseaver, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, marcin.bachry, schmichael, neologix, python-dev |
| 2011-05-07 19:38:06 | pitrou | link | issue8407 messages |
| 2011-05-07 19:38:05 | pitrou | create | |