Message135843
| Author | jstadler |
|---|---|
| Recipients | docs@python, ezio.melotti, jstadler, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2011-05-12.16:04:30 |
| SpamBayes Score | 8.419666e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1305216271.36.0.717786267185.issue8824@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I've updated the 3.x patch, should be correct now. I also updated the 2.x patch to use ``in``. :keyword:`in` was used in an earlier part of the paragraph I modified, so I have changed both for consistency. This is the paragraph before modification: " In all cases, if the optional parts are omitted, the code is executed in the current scope. If only the first expression after :keyword:`in` is specified, it should be a dictionary, which will be used for both the global and the local variables. If two expressions are given, they are used for the global and local variables, respectively. If provided, *locals* can be any mapping object. " |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-05-12 16:04:31 | jstadler | set | recipients: + jstadler, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, docs@python |
| 2011-05-12 16:04:31 | jstadler | set | messageid: <1305216271.36.0.717786267185.issue8824@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-05-12 16:04:30 | jstadler | link | issue8824 messages |
| 2011-05-12 16:04:30 | jstadler | create | |