Message 135943 - Python tracker

Message135943

Author	lemburg
Recipients	brian.curtin, eric.araujo, lemburg, loewis, tim.golden, vstinner
Date	2011-05-13.18:36:04
SpamBayes Score	1.1194245e-06
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<4DCD7A10.8060800@egenix.com>
In-reply-to	<1305307513.76.0.678503170675.issue11377@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
Éric Araujo wrote: > > Éric Araujo <merwok@netwok.org> added the comment: > > haypo asked me on IRC if I’d like to make a patch for this; I will, in some weeks. > > With respect to the recent thread about deprecations and 2.7 → 3.<latest> migrations, should this be a DeprecationWarning or PendingDeprecationWarning? Neither is displayed by default, but using PDW would put the actual removal a version later. I’m not sure about the timeframe here. Please follow the PEP 387 guidelines. We are starting the deprecation process with 3.3. I don't think we need a PendingDeprecationWarning in 3.3, but we might want to add one to 2.7.

Content

Éric Araujo wrote:
> 
> Éric Araujo <merwok@netwok.org> added the comment:
> 
> haypo asked me on IRC if I’d like to make a patch for this; I will, in some weeks.
> 
> With respect to the recent thread about deprecations and 2.7 → 3.<latest> migrations, should this be a DeprecationWarning or PendingDeprecationWarning?  Neither is displayed by default, but using PDW would put the actual removal a version later.  I’m not sure about the timeframe here.

Please follow the PEP 387 guidelines. We are starting the deprecation
process with 3.3. I don't think we need a PendingDeprecationWarning
in 3.3, but we might want to add one to 2.7.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-05-13 18:36:04	lemburg	set	recipients: + lemburg, loewis, vstinner, tim.golden, eric.araujo, brian.curtin
2011-05-13 18:36:04	lemburg	link	issue11377 messages
2011-05-13 18:36:04	lemburg	create