Message136847
| Author | Carl.Crowder |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Carl.Crowder, r.david.murray, vinay.sajip |
| Date | 2011-05-25.14:12:03 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0025219324 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1306332724.0.0.600805083672.issue12168@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Flume certainly could avoid parsing certain values. However, while a syslog application "should avoid octet values below 32", they are still "legal" [1]. I don't think that adjusting flume to reject legal values due to legacy behaviour in some unix syslog daemons is the Right Thing™ here. [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5424#section-6.4 |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-05-25 14:12:04 | Carl.Crowder | set | recipients: + Carl.Crowder, vinay.sajip, r.david.murray |
| 2011-05-25 14:12:04 | Carl.Crowder | set | messageid: <1306332724.0.0.600805083672.issue12168@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-05-25 14:12:03 | Carl.Crowder | link | issue12168 messages |
| 2011-05-25 14:12:03 | Carl.Crowder | create | |