Message137127
| Author | jaraco |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brian.curtin, eric.smith, georg.brandl, jaraco, loewis, nadeem.vawda, ocean-city, santoso.wijaya |
| Date | 2011-05-28.13:04:07 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.026907874 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1306587847.96.0.869711338658.issue12084@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
To the extent that we can, we should try to support relative symlinks. Absolute symlinks aren't the right thing in some cases, where the symlinks should be movable with their targets. I use relative links extensively. Is it worth considering changing the current working directory to the same directory as the symlink when calling DeviceIoControl? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-05-28 13:04:08 | jaraco | set | recipients: + jaraco, loewis, georg.brandl, ocean-city, eric.smith, nadeem.vawda, brian.curtin, santoso.wijaya |
| 2011-05-28 13:04:07 | jaraco | set | messageid: <1306587847.96.0.869711338658.issue12084@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-05-28 13:04:07 | jaraco | link | issue12084 messages |
| 2011-05-28 13:04:07 | jaraco | create | |