Message138730
| Author | rosslagerwall |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, amaury.forgeotdarc, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, jwilk, lemburg, loewis, neologix, pitrou, rosslagerwall, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-06-20.15:22:25 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.541828e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1308583345.84.0.39287057122.issue12326@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> That's exactly my point. > Code checking sys.platform against 'linux2' is already broken, there's > no point in complicating the code further, or adding a new constant. > If you want to check for a specific operating system, there's already > platform.system(). I would agree with this. Perhaps the documentation for sys.platform could be changed to mention that platform.system() should maybe be used instead. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-06-20 15:22:25 | rosslagerwall | set | recipients: + rosslagerwall, lemburg, loewis, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, jwilk, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, neologix |
| 2011-06-20 15:22:25 | rosslagerwall | set | messageid: <1308583345.84.0.39287057122.issue12326@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-06-20 15:22:25 | rosslagerwall | link | issue12326 messages |
| 2011-06-20 15:22:25 | rosslagerwall | create | |