Message139131
| Author | neologix |
|---|---|
| Recipients | gps, neologix, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-06-25.23:40:27 |
| SpamBayes Score | 4.1771298e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1309045228.33.0.659157999882.issue11870@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> This skip gives very few information, and it is duplicated for each > function. I would prefer a constant of the "broken OSes" with your > following comment attached to the constant: Ok, I'll try to write something along those lines. > If the creation of a thread after a fork is reliable on some systems, > we should not deny the creation of new threads after a fork. Well, the problem is that it is not reliable on any platform, but happens to work "most of the time" on some platforms ;-) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-06-25 23:40:28 | neologix | set | recipients: + neologix, vstinner, gps |
| 2011-06-25 23:40:28 | neologix | set | messageid: <1309045228.33.0.659157999882.issue11870@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-06-25 23:40:27 | neologix | link | issue11870 messages |
| 2011-06-25 23:40:27 | neologix | create | |