Message139166
| Author | neologix |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, amaury.forgeotdarc, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, jwilk, lemburg, loewis, neologix, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-06-26.10:47:56 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.5560875e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1309085277.1.0.915737174713.issue12326@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> So people who say sys.platform shouldn't be used: what do you propose > to do with Lib/plat-linux2 (or, more generally, Lib/plat-*)? I can't speak, as I've never used those. But can't those directories be renamed to Lib/plat-<platform.system()>? As for the performance overhead, since the platform module caches the result of uname or other function/subprocess calls, I don't think it's a showstopper. Furthermore, I somehow doubt those functions are performance bottlenecks anyway. Since Linux 3 is in RC now, is there a chance to reach a consensus in the near future? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-06-26 10:47:57 | neologix | set | recipients: + neologix, lemburg, loewis, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, jwilk, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, petri.lehtinen |
| 2011-06-26 10:47:57 | neologix | set | messageid: <1309085277.1.0.915737174713.issue12326@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-06-26 10:47:56 | neologix | link | issue12326 messages |
| 2011-06-26 10:47:56 | neologix | create | |