Message140062
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, amaury.forgeotdarc, doko, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, jwilk, lemburg, loewis, neologix, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-07-09.13:29:27 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00013734358 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1310218112.3677.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1310218025.74.0.175706858316.issue12326@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> while this is sorted out, I propose to apply the following workaround > not to introduce `linux3', at least for the branches: It's too late, since existing versions won't have the patch and will show "linux3" when the kernel gets upgraded. I think we'd better bite the bullet and accept the "linux3" value. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-07-09 13:29:28 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, lemburg, loewis, doko, amaury.forgeotdarc, vstinner, jwilk, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, neologix, rosslagerwall, petri.lehtinen |
| 2011-07-09 13:29:28 | pitrou | link | issue12326 messages |
| 2011-07-09 13:29:27 | pitrou | create | |