Message140729
| Author | abingham |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, brian.curtin, exarkun, fperez, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou |
| Date | 2011-07-20.13:48:04 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.018323561 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1311169684.88.0.320480849896.issue7897@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Has a decision been made to implement some form of parametric tests? Is working being done? Along with parameterizing individual test methods, I'd also like to throw out a request for parametric TestCases. In some cases I find that I want the behavior of setUp() or tearDown() to vary based on some set of parameters, but the individual tests are not parametric per se. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-07-20 13:48:05 | abingham | set | recipients: + abingham, exarkun, ncoghlan, pitrou, michael.foord, brian.curtin, fperez, Yaroslav.Halchenko, nchauvat |
| 2011-07-20 13:48:04 | abingham | set | messageid: <1311169684.88.0.320480849896.issue7897@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-07-20 13:48:04 | abingham | link | issue7897 messages |
| 2011-07-20 13:48:04 | abingham | create | |