Message140785
| Author | abingham |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Yaroslav.Halchenko, abingham, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, eric.snow, exarkun, ezio.melotti, fperez, michael.foord, nchauvat, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray |
| Date | 2011-07-21.05:40:27 |
| SpamBayes Score | 2.7215452e-12 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <CAEZidR11=Jfuf0QhUydittsgX+2wqaTP1kYZGHS5dJCgGtUBxg@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1311170602.01.0.108817720696.issue7897@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
OK, I created issue 12600 for dealing with parameterized TestCases as opposed to individual tests. On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:03 PM, R. David Murray <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > Unless someone sees a clever way to implement both with the same mechanism, parameterizing test cases should probably be a separate issue. Doing it via subclassing is straightforward, which also argues for a separate issue, since an 'is this worth it' discussion should be done separately for that feature. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-07-21 05:40:28 | abingham | set | recipients: + abingham, exarkun, ncoghlan, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, fperez, Yaroslav.Halchenko, nchauvat, eric.snow |
| 2011-07-21 05:40:27 | abingham | link | issue7897 messages |
| 2011-07-21 05:40:27 | abingham | create | |