Message141461
| Author | nadeem.vawda |
|---|---|
| Recipients | chortos, nadeem.vawda, petri.lehtinen, pitrou |
| Date | 2011-07-31.10:37:56 |
| SpamBayes Score | 9.576127e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1312108677.81.0.310720530252.issue12646@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Looking at Lib/test/test_zlib.py, it appears that this behaviour is intentional (see issue8672). I agree that having flush() raise an exception is the Right Thing, but breaking existing code (which we know depends on this behavior) is clearly a bad idea. @pitrou - anything thoughts on this? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-07-31 10:37:57 | nadeem.vawda | set | recipients: + nadeem.vawda, pitrou, chortos, petri.lehtinen |
| 2011-07-31 10:37:57 | nadeem.vawda | set | messageid: <1312108677.81.0.310720530252.issue12646@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-07-31 10:37:57 | nadeem.vawda | link | issue12646 messages |
| 2011-07-31 10:37:56 | nadeem.vawda | create | |