Message141547
| Author | scott.dial |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, jaraco, orsenthil, python-dev, scott.dial |
| Date | 2011-08-02.07:08:19 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00074435095 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1312268900.48.0.901489045121.issue10639@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I haven't seen anyone use a side-effect-less statement (a string) as a comment before, but I doubt that is an approved style for the CPython codebase. Please change the string preceeding the spec_line definition into a proper comment. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-08-02 07:08:20 | scott.dial | set | recipients: + scott.dial, jaraco, orsenthil, eric.araujo, eli.bendersky, python-dev |
| 2011-08-02 07:08:20 | scott.dial | set | messageid: <1312268900.48.0.901489045121.issue10639@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-08-02 07:08:19 | scott.dial | link | issue10639 messages |
| 2011-08-02 07:08:19 | scott.dial | create | |