Message141880
| Author | lemburg |
|---|---|
| Recipients | alanjds, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, daniel.urban, davidfraser, eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, techtonik, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-08-10.17:39:52 |
| SpamBayes Score | 6.4940534e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <4E42C262.5020608@egenix.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1312997390.95.0.573390430663.issue9528@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Alan Justino wrote: > > I am getting a hard time trying to do some BDD with c-based datetime because I cannot mock it easily to force datetime.datetime.now() to return a desired value, making almost impossible to test time-based code, like the accounting system that I am refactoring right now. It's usually better to use a central helper get_current_time() in the application, than to use datetime.now() and others directly. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-08-10 17:39:52 | lemburg | set | recipients: + lemburg, tim.peters, brett.cannon, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, davidfraser, belopolsky, pitrou, vstinner, techtonik, giampaolo.rodola, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, daniel.urban, alanjds |
| 2011-08-10 17:39:52 | lemburg | link | issue9528 messages |
| 2011-08-10 17:39:52 | lemburg | create | |