Message142002
| Author | orsenthil |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, catherine, doerwalter, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, gpolo, lambacck, orsenthil, pitrou, python-dev, r.david.murray, rhettinger, ron_adam |
| Date | 2011-08-13.00:36:54 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0003424201 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <20110813003645.GA2219@mathmagic> |
| In-reply-to | <1313168123.69.0.38830809068.issue10087@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Hello Éric, I might have ignored some minor stylistic comments. The '.' in the help text and , after the last TestName, I am not sure if it is of concern. I think, to update the stylistic comments, if the submitters (if they care) could have updated the patch, or a separate commit on style changes can be done (if they are worth it). And yeah, it is bad to ignore substantiative comments. I hope, I did not overlook any. Ezio's main point was he was worried about using sys.stdout.buffer (as I was too) and we got that clarified. Thanks, Senthil |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-08-13 00:36:56 | orsenthil | set | recipients: + orsenthil, doerwalter, georg.brandl, rhettinger, belopolsky, pitrou, ron_adam, gpolo, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, lambacck, r.david.murray, catherine, python-dev |
| 2011-08-13 00:36:55 | orsenthil | link | issue10087 messages |
| 2011-08-13 00:36:54 | orsenthil | create | |