Message142379
| Author | loewis |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, Ramchandra Apte, amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, djc, dmalcolm, doko, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, foom, gagern, jwilk, lemburg, loewis, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, python-dev, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, sandro.tosi, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-08-18.17:43:33 |
| SpamBayes Score | 4.022725e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <4E4D4F44.9060502@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to | <CAH_1eM2d4cOEC17P6O9qBmTj4iCPAXjPYONpK0DGUuCbBX=qqg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> The point is precisely that we don't change anything: applications > checking against sys.platform are already broken, there's no reason to > comfort them into using this defective check. You grossly misunderstand the concept of "backwards compatibility". At times, features get added to allow even buggy (or perceived-buggy) applications to continue to work under a change. > The applications that encountered the problem (chromium, matplotlib > and probably others) already performed the change to > sys.platform.startswith(), so it's really the only way to go. I'm very certain that not all applications have been changed yet. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-08-18 17:43:34 | loewis | set | recipients: + loewis, lemburg, barry, doko, amaury.forgeotdarc, gagern, foom, pitrou, vstinner, jwilk, djc, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, dmalcolm, sandro.tosi, rosslagerwall, python-dev, petri.lehtinen, Ramchandra Apte |
| 2011-08-18 17:43:33 | loewis | link | issue12326 messages |
| 2011-08-18 17:43:33 | loewis | create | |