Message142498
| Author | loewis |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, Ramchandra Apte, amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, benjamin.peterson, djc, dmalcolm, doko, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, foom, gagern, georg.brandl, jwilk, lemburg, loewis, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, python-dev, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, sandro.tosi, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-08-19.21:16:21 |
| SpamBayes Score | 2.9953264e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <4E4ED2A4.1040409@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to | <4E4EC420.8060207@egenix.com> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
>> The only way I can read this argument that makes any sense to me is >> that you are arguing for a precise build-time OS string. If it is >> supposed to be an argument in favor of keeping 'linux3' it makes no >> sense, since '2' vs '3' is in no way a useful line of demarcation >> when it comes to linux. The build time Linux kernel has no effect on Python's build procedure whatsoever. Python does not use the kernel at all for building; it only uses the C library headers, and the kernel headers that happen to be incorporated into the version of the C library installed. That affects what features get selected during build time. Notice that the proposed fix to keep os.platform to "linux2" actually means that there is *no change*, as os.platform always was "linux2" on the system. It is a bug that it reports "linux3" in some cases, and that bug is being fixed. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-08-19 21:16:22 | loewis | set | recipients: + loewis, lemburg, barry, georg.brandl, doko, amaury.forgeotdarc, gagern, foom, pitrou, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, jwilk, djc, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, dmalcolm, sandro.tosi, rosslagerwall, python-dev, petri.lehtinen, Ramchandra Apte |
| 2011-08-19 21:16:21 | loewis | link | issue12326 messages |
| 2011-08-19 21:16:21 | loewis | create | |