Message142611
| Author | eric.araujo |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, pitrou, simpkins |
| Date | 2011-08-21.11:36:36 |
| SpamBayes Score | 3.1223811e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1313926596.9.0.461176861453.issue12803@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I've attached a patch that adds an extra password argument, which can be > either a string, bytes, bytearray, or a function to call to get the password. It seems a bit strange to me to accept string types or callable in the same argument. If it just supported strings, people could still write password=somefunction(), right? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-08-21 11:36:37 | eric.araujo | set | recipients: + eric.araujo, janssen, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, simpkins |
| 2011-08-21 11:36:36 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1313926596.9.0.461176861453.issue12803@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-08-21 11:36:36 | eric.araujo | link | issue12803 messages |
| 2011-08-21 11:36:36 | eric.araujo | create | |