Message143290
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | docs@python, gvanrossum, ncoghlan |
| Date | 2011-09-01.00:58:27 |
| SpamBayes Score | 4.1826057e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1314838708.13.0.0598806730673.issue12874@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
'Sequence Types - list, tuple, str, bytes, etc' *might* work, but I think part of the problem is that str's brevity is actually a downside in this case. I know I missed it when I was scanning the ToC earlier (I wanted to check if the internal Unicode repr for narrow builds was documented at all - it doesn't appear to be). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-09-01 00:58:28 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, gvanrossum, docs@python |
| 2011-09-01 00:58:28 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1314838708.13.0.0598806730673.issue12874@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-09-01 00:58:27 | ncoghlan | link | issue12874 messages |
| 2011-09-01 00:58:27 | ncoghlan | create | |