Message143337
| Author | ezio.melotti |
|---|---|
| Recipients | akitada, akoumjian, alex, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, davide.rizzo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, jacques, jaylogan, jhalcrow, jimjjewett, loewis, mark, moreati, mrabarnett, nneonneo, pitrou, r.david.murray, ronnix, rsc, sjmachin, steven.daprano, stiv, timehorse, vbr, zdwiel |
| Date | 2011-09-01.18:12:43 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.018609956 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1314900764.54.0.497634516656.issue2636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Thanks for the explanation, but isn't this a backward incompatible feature? I think it should be enabled only when the re.NEW flag is passed. The idiom [][...] is also quite common, so I think it might break different programs if regex has a different behavior. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-09-01 18:12:44 | ezio.melotti | set | recipients: + ezio.melotti, loewis, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jimjjewett, sjmachin, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, pitrou, nneonneo, giampaolo.rodola, rsc, timehorse, mark, vbr, mrabarnett, jaylogan, akitada, moreati, steven.daprano, alex, r.david.murray, jacques, zdwiel, jhalcrow, stiv, davide.rizzo, ronnix, eric.snow, akoumjian |
| 2011-09-01 18:12:44 | ezio.melotti | set | messageid: <1314900764.54.0.497634516656.issue2636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-09-01 18:12:43 | ezio.melotti | link | issue2636 messages |
| 2011-09-01 18:12:43 | ezio.melotti | create | |