Message144085
| Author | lars.gustaebel |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Christophe Simonis, Garen, Nam.Nguyen, amaury.forgeotdarc, arekm, asvetlov, barry, doko, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, jcea, jeremybanks, jreese, lars.gustaebel, leonov, loewis, nadeem.vawda, nicdumz, nikratio, ockham-razor, pitrou, proyvind, rcoyner, shirish, strombrg, thedjatclubrock, tshepang, ysj.ray |
| Date | 2011-09-15.16:14:16 |
| SpamBayes Score | 4.1771127e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1316103256.93.0.161325210701.issue6715@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Today I played around with lzma support for tarfile based on your last patch (see issue5689). There are a few minor issues that I just wanted to mention, as they break the tarfile testsuite: - LZMAFile does not expose a name attribute. BZ2File doesn't either (not in 3.x anyway), but GzipFile does. - LZMAFile does not allow a 'b' in the mode argument, unlike GzipFile and BZ2File. - The bz2 module exposes many error conditions as standard Python exceptions, e.g. IOError, EOFError. The lzma module uses LZMAError for all errors without distinction. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-09-15 16:14:17 | lars.gustaebel | set | recipients: + lars.gustaebel, loewis, barry, georg.brandl, doko, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, arekm, pitrou, nadeem.vawda, nicdumz, eric.araujo, Christophe Simonis, rcoyner, proyvind, asvetlov, nikratio, leonov, Garen, ysj.ray, thedjatclubrock, ockham-razor, jreese, strombrg, shirish, tshepang, jeremybanks, Nam.Nguyen |
| 2011-09-15 16:14:16 | lars.gustaebel | set | messageid: <1316103256.93.0.161325210701.issue6715@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-09-15 16:14:16 | lars.gustaebel | link | issue6715 messages |
| 2011-09-15 16:14:16 | lars.gustaebel | create | |