Message144178
| Author | lunaryorn |
|---|---|
| Recipients | a01, alex, lunaryorn |
| Date | 2011-09-17.08:05:21 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0043480783 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1316246722.08.0.339570695785.issue12998@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Why should it? After all, you're sort of abusing ctypes by repeatedly creating Struture types over and over again. C structures that you might want to wrap with these types are fixed and known at the time of programming, so there is never a need to create the same Structure type twice. Thus the set of Structure subclasses created during the live-time of a program is both, fixed and small, so there is no need to limit the cache size. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-09-17 08:05:22 | lunaryorn | set | recipients: + lunaryorn, alex, a01 |
| 2011-09-17 08:05:22 | lunaryorn | set | messageid: <1316246722.08.0.339570695785.issue12998@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-09-17 08:05:21 | lunaryorn | link | issue12998 messages |
| 2011-09-17 08:05:21 | lunaryorn | create | |