Message144482
| Author | meador.inge |
|---|---|
| Recipients | alex, ezio.melotti, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2011-09-24.02:20:57 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.6211317e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1316830858.86.0.819835023986.issue13012@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Doing two separate commits is probably better. Out of curiosity, what is typically the convention on that? The devguide seems to suggest one changeset per issue: """ Just please make sure that you generate a single, condensed patch rather than a series of several changesets. """ I think for this case two patches is better. In general, I am OK with the git-style series and hg-style patchbombs, but the devguide seems to say otherwise. Hmmm, that makes me wonder if we can patchbomb the tracker :-) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-09-24 02:20:58 | meador.inge | set | recipients: + meador.inge, terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, ezio.melotti, alex |
| 2011-09-24 02:20:58 | meador.inge | set | messageid: <1316830858.86.0.819835023986.issue13012@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-09-24 02:20:58 | meador.inge | link | issue13012 messages |
| 2011-09-24 02:20:57 | meador.inge | create | |