Message144483
| Author | terry.reedy |
|---|---|
| Recipients | alex, ezio.melotti, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2011-09-24.02:36:44 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.5363867e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1316831805.14.0.86000360703.issue13012@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
One changeset per issue is a general goal. So is the ability to review patches. Sometime people forget to add a News or Acks entry and have to followup with an addendum. (Mark's patch still lack that, for instance.) Sometimes a patch is so large that a reviewer asks or requires splitting. In this case, each patch is large enough and touches enough files (up to 10 I think) that two is plausible. What would not be appreciated by either a reviewer or commit-list recipients would be one patch file per patched file. That would be a patch bomb indeed ;-) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-09-24 02:36:45 | terry.reedy | set | recipients: + terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, ezio.melotti, alex, meador.inge |
| 2011-09-24 02:36:45 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1316831805.14.0.86000360703.issue13012@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-09-24 02:36:44 | terry.reedy | link | issue13012 messages |
| 2011-09-24 02:36:44 | terry.reedy | create | |