Message144497
| Author | mark.dickinson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | alex, ezio.melotti, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, python-dev, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2011-09-24.10:52:30 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.9492725e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1316861551.62.0.563425870072.issue13012@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Ezio's patch looks fine to me, though as Meador points out in the Rietveld review, there are a couple of omissions that could be fixed. Personally, I'm not so convinced of the value of upgrading all the existing uses of splitlines to use 'keepends'; I just wanted to be able to do this in *new* code. :-) I guess I'm +0 on the int -> bool changes (replacing .splitlines(1) with .splitlines(True)), and -0 on adding the extra 'splitlines' keywords throughout existing source. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-09-24 10:52:31 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients: + mark.dickinson, terry.reedy, ezio.melotti, alex, meador.inge, python-dev |
| 2011-09-24 10:52:31 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1316861551.62.0.563425870072.issue13012@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-09-24 10:52:31 | mark.dickinson | link | issue13012 messages |
| 2011-09-24 10:52:30 | mark.dickinson | create | |