Message146872
| Author | neologix |
|---|---|
| Recipients | flox, neologix, petri.lehtinen, vilya, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-11-02.19:30:48 |
| SpamBayes Score | 5.6386366e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <CAH_1eM1aGyhWdK58n+LsfOJbTQ7S0A0HyZ6zGh1Jr5ww8LDFWw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1320260423.37.0.651169011883.issue13285@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
>> Could it return an opaque wrapper object, rather than just the raw >> address? Something like: > > Are you suggesting that it would return either a Python function object or a > wrapper object? I think it would be an ugly kludge. I don't like the idea of passing around an opaque "blob" just for that purpose (I mean, it's really a corner case). So I'm -1. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-11-02 19:30:49 | neologix | set | recipients: + neologix, vstinner, vilya, flox, petri.lehtinen |
| 2011-11-02 19:30:48 | neologix | link | issue13285 messages |
| 2011-11-02 19:30:48 | neologix | create | |