Message147815
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eric.snow, meador.inge, ncoghlan, neologix, pitrou, skrah, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-11-17.18:00:56 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00047964946 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1321552563.3362.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1321552556.73.0.454519182969.issue13411@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I'm not sure that the "register" storage class specifier is still > relevant with modern compilers: I'm pretty sure gcc ignores it unless > -O0, and I think I've read somewhere Microsoft's compiler ignores it > too. I don't think so either. I was lazily moving the original code, but I could remove those bits. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-11-17 18:00:57 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, ncoghlan, vstinner, skrah, meador.inge, neologix, eric.snow |
| 2011-11-17 18:00:57 | pitrou | link | issue13411 messages |
| 2011-11-17 18:00:56 | pitrou | create | |