Message148305
| Author | eric.snow |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eric.snow, ncoghlan |
| Date | 2011-11-25.06:09:28 |
| SpamBayes Score | 9.695575e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1322201369.94.0.963717599819.issue13475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
+1 Both the -p and --nopath0 would be great additions and a good match for PEP 395. So "-p ." would be equivalent to the current implicit sys.path[0] initialization, right? Would any other effects happen with "-p" than sys.path[0] initialization? I'll follow up with my one concern (the implicit "-p .") in a follow-up message. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-11-25 06:09:30 | eric.snow | set | recipients: + eric.snow, ncoghlan |
| 2011-11-25 06:09:29 | eric.snow | set | messageid: <1322201369.94.0.963717599819.issue13475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-11-25 06:09:29 | eric.snow | link | issue13475 messages |
| 2011-11-25 06:09:29 | eric.snow | create | |