Message148711
| Author | ezio.melotti |
|---|---|
| Recipients | docs@python, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan |
| Date | 2011-12-01.08:10:21 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.1363502e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1322727022.11.0.935606226368.issue13515@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Grouping the common warnings in a "Security Considerations" section sounds OK, but the warnings should still be visible IMHO. In my experience, people: 1) jump right to the doc for the function they are using; 2) read the example and try to figure out how it works; 3) if that fails, they read the text. An inline text with a simple link might then pass unnoticed. OTOH littering the doc with red boxes is far too noticeable. Maybe we should use something in between (e.g. a "lighter" CSS for the warnings or a small warning icon). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-12-01 08:10:22 | ezio.melotti | set | recipients: + ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, docs@python |
| 2011-12-01 08:10:22 | ezio.melotti | set | messageid: <1322727022.11.0.935606226368.issue13515@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-12-01 08:10:21 | ezio.melotti | link | issue13515 messages |
| 2011-12-01 08:10:21 | ezio.melotti | create | |