Message149166
| Author | eric.araujo |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eric.araujo, pitrou, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-12-10.16:30:14 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.0463171e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1323534615.79.0.826598801416.issue13550@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On #13550 I asked Guido about the Thing/_Thing function/class indirection and use of _Verbose; the reply: > IIRC: > > The design started out this way because it predates new-style classes. When this was put in one > couldn't subclass extension types, and there were plans/hopes to replace some of the lock types > with platform-specific built-in versions on some platforms. > > Since it is now possible to write subclassable extension types the Thing/_Thing design is no > longer needed. > > I'm not sure about the _Verbose hacks, if it is deemed not useful I'm fine with letting it go. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-12-10 16:30:15 | eric.araujo | set | recipients: + eric.araujo, tim.peters, pitrou, vstinner |
| 2011-12-10 16:30:15 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1323534615.79.0.826598801416.issue13550@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-12-10 16:30:15 | eric.araujo | link | issue13550 messages |
| 2011-12-10 16:30:14 | eric.araujo | create | |