Message149285
| Author | techtonik |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Garen, belopolsky, danchr, dhduvall, dmalcolm, fche, glyph, hazmat, jbaker, jcea, jmcp, laca, lasizoillo, loewis, mjw, movement, neologix, pitrou, rhettinger, robert.kern, ronaldoussoren, scox, serverhorror, sirg3, techtonik, twleung, wsanchez |
| Date | 2011-12-12.10:47:02 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00015766708 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <CAPkN8xJfTX7=H2pWYN5Eyja79b=iqsEWAjTnArDKcQDsPXdd2g@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <CAH_1eM3K2HvO6qM+gps95Am4==cs4HK=rdfAo01tPybXhZ7yNg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
2011/12/12 Charles-François Natali <report@bugs.python.org> > > Charles-François Natali <neologix@free.fr> added the comment: > > > Alan, I would open a new issue tracking this one and posting a patch > there, if I were you. > > > > Previous DTRACE attempts failed because trying to make everybody happy. > I don't want to repeat the mistake. > > > > Sorry, but I'm -1. > I don't feel comfortable with adding a such amount of intrusive code, > which will have to be maintained as the interpreter evolves, to add > probes just for Solaris derivatives, which is, with all due respect, > really a niche platform. So If we merge this, this should at least > support SystemTap upfront. > Is SystemTap an alternative to DTrace? I see that SystemTap is only for Linux, while DTrace is available also on MacOS and FreeBSD. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-12-12 10:47:03 | techtonik | set | recipients: + techtonik, loewis, rhettinger, jcea, ronaldoussoren, belopolsky, pitrou, wsanchez, movement, serverhorror, glyph, laca, twleung, jbaker, robert.kern, sirg3, danchr, dhduvall, dmalcolm, mjw, Garen, neologix, lasizoillo, fche, hazmat, jmcp, scox |
| 2011-12-12 10:47:02 | techtonik | link | issue13405 messages |
| 2011-12-12 10:47:02 | techtonik | create | |