Message 149288 - Python tracker

Message149288

Author	pitrou
Recipients	giampaolo.rodola, josiahcarlson, mark.dickinson, pitrou
Date	2011-12-12.11:17:16
SpamBayes Score	4.0343586e-08
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1323688624.21067.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to	<1323688412.68.0.823194579751.issue8684@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> Versions #2 and #3 have the same cost, so it's better to get rid of > the explicit argument and always use the lock (version #3). > Differences between #1 and #3 suggest that introducing the lock > obviously have a cost though. > It's not too high IMO, but I couldn't say whether it's acceptable or > not. It looks quite negligible to me. Nobody should be affected in practice.

Content

> Versions #2 and #3 have the same cost, so it's better to get rid of
> the explicit argument and always use the lock (version #3).
> Differences between #1 and #3 suggest that introducing the lock
> obviously have a cost though.
> It's not too high IMO, but I couldn't say whether it's acceptable or
> not.

It looks quite negligible to me. Nobody should be affected in practice.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-12-12 11:17:16	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, josiahcarlson, mark.dickinson, giampaolo.rodola
2011-12-12 11:17:16	pitrou	link	issue8684 messages
2011-12-12 11:17:16	pitrou	create