Message149556
| Author | skrah |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, brian.curtin, casevh, ced, eric.smith, eric.snow, jjconti, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, skrah, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-12-15.14:00:50 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0013360763 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1323957652.29.0.640111460598.issue7652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Amaury has asked for more comments (and I agree). However, I'm not sure what level of detail would be appropriate. As an example, I've posted the full proof of the x87 modular multiplication in umodarith.h. Even with the Coq parts stripped, this would still be a massive comment. Would you prefer that level of detail or should I just post the core of the algorithm? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-12-15 14:00:52 | skrah | set | recipients: + skrah, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, casevh, eric.smith, jjconti, ced, brian.curtin, eric.snow |
| 2011-12-15 14:00:52 | skrah | set | messageid: <1323957652.29.0.640111460598.issue7652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-12-15 14:00:51 | skrah | link | issue7652 messages |
| 2011-12-15 14:00:51 | skrah | create | |