Message149567
| Author | Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, amaury.forgeotdarc, brian.curtin, casevh, ced, eric.smith, eric.snow, jjconti, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, skrah, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-12-15.17:33:08 |
| SpamBayes Score | 2.0660085e-11 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <CAGmFidbNPbRYFbfu68=GNahghObaP4dpp3erEQ-CfhSNA1L1cA@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1323957652.29.0.640111460598.issue7652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
2011/12/15 Stefan Krah <report@bugs.python.org> > > Stefan Krah <stefan-usenet@bytereef.org> added the comment: > > Amaury has asked for more comments (and I agree). However, I'm not sure > what > level of detail would be appropriate. As an example, I've posted the full > proof of the x87 modular multiplication in umodarith.h. > > > Even with the Coq parts stripped, this would still be a massive comment. > > > Would you prefer that level of detail or should I just post the core > of the algorithm? > For my part, a two-lines description of the purpose of file is enough. Something like "Routines for the reverse transmogrification of randomized digits, used in multiplication of numbers above 2**32 bits" Or something else that makes sense :-) At least something that makes it clear that I don't have to read further if I'm only interested in the definition of Python classes for example. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-12-15 17:33:09 | Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc | set | recipients: + Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, casevh, eric.smith, jjconti, ced, brian.curtin, skrah, eric.snow |
| 2011-12-15 17:33:09 | Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc | link | issue7652 messages |
| 2011-12-15 17:33:08 | Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc | create | |