Message149998
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | asksol, brandon-rhodes, cool-RR, dholth, jnoller, neologix, numbernine, pitrou, rcoyner, santoso.wijaya, sbt, vsekhar |
| Date | 2011-12-21.15:28:03 |
| SpamBayes Score | 4.0611843e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1324481242.3385.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1324479868.79.0.609367570922.issue8713@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Thanks for the patch sbt. > I think this is indeed useful, but I'm tempted to go further and say > we should make this the default - and only - behavior. This will > probably break existing code that accidentaly relied the fact that the > implementation uses a bare fork(), There is probably lots of such code: - code that passes non-pickleable function object / function args to execute in the child process - code that executes code with side effects at module top level - code that relies (willingly or not) on other stuff such as fds being inherited |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-12-21 15:28:04 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, jnoller, rcoyner, asksol, cool-RR, dholth, brandon-rhodes, neologix, santoso.wijaya, sbt, numbernine, vsekhar |
| 2011-12-21 15:28:03 | pitrou | link | issue8713 messages |
| 2011-12-21 15:28:03 | pitrou | create | |