Message150028
| Author | nikratio |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Julian, eric.araujo, eric.snow, giampaolo.rodola, ncoghlan, nikratio, rhettinger, smarnach |
| Date | 2011-12-21.18:15:10 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00047573537 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <4EF2222D.6010201@rath.org> |
| In-reply-to | <1324486983.89.0.30111495326.issue13585@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On 12/21/2011 12:03 PM, Éric Araujo wrote: > > Éric Araujo <merwok@netwok.org> added the comment: > >>> In the passage I quoted, I don’t understand what is meant by “non-Python resources”. >> Think about e.g. mounting a file system. > > Ah, ok. In that case there would still be a Python-level object (just like a Python file object will also release the OS-level handle when it’s closed). I don't think so. subprocess.check_call(['mount', 'bla', '/mnt']) Allocates the resource (mounts the file system) but doesn't leave you with any Python object. Best, -Nikolaus |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-12-21 18:15:11 | nikratio | set | recipients: + nikratio, rhettinger, ncoghlan, giampaolo.rodola, eric.araujo, Julian, eric.snow, smarnach |
| 2011-12-21 18:15:11 | nikratio | link | issue13585 messages |
| 2011-12-21 18:15:10 | nikratio | create | |