Message150348
| Author | zbysz |
|---|---|
| Recipients | SilentGhost, eric.araujo, grobian, haubi, sandro.tosi, tarek, zbysz |
| Date | 2011-12-29.20:39:47 |
| SpamBayes Score | 4.8321663e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1325191188.23.0.942507595212.issue7719@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Review of both patches (python-2.5.1-distutils-aixnfs.patch and dir_util.py.diff) as they are essentially the same:
I think that the test is in wrong place: we would want to ignore those .nfs* files always, not just when checking for symlinks. A separate test
at the top of the loop would be better:
for n in names:
+ if n.startswith('.nfs'):
+ continue
src_name = os.path.join(src, n)
dst_name = os.path.join(dst, n)
if preserve_symlinks and os.path.islink(src_name):
BTW: under linux 2.6.20 I see files like: .nfs000000000592413900000036, always of this length, with hexadecimal digits after .nfs). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-12-29 20:39:48 | zbysz | set | recipients: + zbysz, tarek, eric.araujo, haubi, SilentGhost, grobian, sandro.tosi |
| 2011-12-29 20:39:48 | zbysz | set | messageid: <1325191188.23.0.942507595212.issue7719@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-12-29 20:39:47 | zbysz | link | issue7719 messages |
| 2011-12-29 20:39:47 | zbysz | create | |