Message150715
| Author | loewis |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, amaury.forgeotdarc, denilsonsa, giampaolo.rodola, loewis, neologix, pitrou, rosslagerwall, vstinner, zbysz |
| Date | 2012-01-06.06:10:01 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.0554975e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <20120106071000.Horde.lmWaTNjz9kRPBpA4mrbjqdA@webmail.df.eu> |
| In-reply-to | <1325799659.8907.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Zitat von Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org>: > Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment: > > The point of named tuples here is that you can use both > get_terminal_size().columns > or > columns, rows = get_terminal_size() > depending on the situation. And my point is that we should make the choice which of these is more obvious, and drop the other. > Also, the better repr() makes debugging easier. A class could still have a nice repr. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-01-06 06:10:02 | loewis | set | recipients: + loewis, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, Arfrever, zbysz, denilsonsa, neologix, rosslagerwall |
| 2012-01-06 06:10:01 | loewis | link | issue13609 messages |
| 2012-01-06 06:10:01 | loewis | create | |