Message150867
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, David.Townshend, Devin Jeanpierre, Julian, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, cvrebert, docs@python, eric.araujo, neologix, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date | 2012-01-08.14:36:57 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.4872526e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1326033418.04.0.645986399942.issue12760@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I don't think the "created()" method has to be exposed. People can inspect the "mode" attribute if they want to have that information. (besides, the semantics are misleading since a new file opened with "w" has also be created, but created() would return False) There's some bogus indentation in the patch (it uses tab characters in some places). Also: + if not (creating + reading or writing or appending): Not sure why the "+". Shouldn't it be "or" instead? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-01-08 14:36:58 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, amaury.forgeotdarc, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, Devin Jeanpierre, eric.araujo, Arfrever, cvrebert, neologix, docs@python, Julian, David.Townshend |
| 2012-01-08 14:36:58 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1326033418.04.0.645986399942.issue12760@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-01-08 14:36:57 | pitrou | link | issue12760 messages |
| 2012-01-08 14:36:57 | pitrou | create | |