Message151548
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | BreamoreBoy, amaury.forgeotdarc, dmaurer, eric.araujo, eric.snow, facundobatista, flub, gvanrossum, jotr, meador.inge, pitrou, python-dev, vpelletier |
| Date | 2012-01-18.16:29:58 |
| SpamBayes Score | 2.4486867e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1326904199.49.0.396418860061.issue1785@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Thanks for noticing. The doc for ismethod() says: “Return true if the object is a bound method written in Python.” and the docstring agrees with that: “Return true if the object is an instance method. [...]” So the change isn't properly a regression when reading the docs. On the other hand, it's true that some code may rely on the previous behaviour, and the discrepancy between getmembers() and a manual test can be confusing. By the way, Python 3 has ismethod() right: >>> class B: ... def f(self): pass ... >>> inspect.ismethod(B.f) False >>> inspect.ismethod(B().f) True |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-01-18 16:29:59 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, facundobatista, dmaurer, amaury.forgeotdarc, flub, eric.araujo, meador.inge, jotr, BreamoreBoy, python-dev, eric.snow, vpelletier |
| 2012-01-18 16:29:59 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1326904199.49.0.396418860061.issue1785@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-01-18 16:29:58 | pitrou | link | issue1785 messages |
| 2012-01-18 16:29:58 | pitrou | create | |