Message151676
| Author | dmalcolm |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Garen, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, danchr, dhduvall, dmalcolm, fche, glyph, hazmat, jbaker, jcea, jmcp, laca, lasizoillo, loewis, mjw, movement, neologix, pitrou, rhettinger, robert.kern, ronaldoussoren, scox, serverhorror, sirg3, techtonik, twleung, wsanchez |
| Date | 2012-01-20.04:52:56 |
| SpamBayes Score | 5.0012445e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1327035145.4992.109.camel@surprise> |
| In-reply-to | <1327034771.72.0.795847886613.issue13405@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 04:46 +0000, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org> added the comment: > > As great as a tool it maybe, it's still only available on a minority platform. So I couldn't really try it. FWIW, the analogous systemtap patch works great on Linux, or, at least Fedora 13+/RHEL 6 (though beware: not all Linux distributions have systemtap working properly out of the box, alas). See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemtapStaticProbes#Python_2 and http://bugs.python.org/issue4111 though this stalled due to lack of documentation (I started writing some, but got bogged down in the differences between the tapsets and the static markers; sorry). Dave |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-01-20 04:52:57 | dmalcolm | set | recipients: + dmalcolm, loewis, rhettinger, jcea, ronaldoussoren, belopolsky, pitrou, wsanchez, movement, techtonik, benjamin.peterson, serverhorror, glyph, laca, twleung, jbaker, robert.kern, sirg3, danchr, dhduvall, mjw, Garen, neologix, lasizoillo, fche, hazmat, jmcp, scox |
| 2012-01-20 04:52:57 | dmalcolm | link | issue13405 messages |
| 2012-01-20 04:52:56 | dmalcolm | create | |