Message152098
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | anasofiapaixao, dcbbcd, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, ncoghlan, rhettinger, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2012-01-27.14:33:46 |
| SpamBayes Score | 3.9327647e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1327674827.58.0.530581465007.issue4966@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
One other things the branch doesn't currently sort out is the official signature of count() and index(). In 3.2, for *all* of str, bytes, bytearray, tuple, list, range, the index() method takes the optional start:stop parameters. collections.Sequence.index(), OTOH, does not. count() splits the field more evenly: str, bytes, bytearray accept the extra parameters, but list, tuple, range and collections.Sequence only support counting values in the whole sequence. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-01-27 14:33:47 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, georg.brandl, rhettinger, terry.reedy, dcbbcd, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, docs@python, anasofiapaixao |
| 2012-01-27 14:33:47 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1327674827.58.0.530581465007.issue4966@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-01-27 14:33:47 | ncoghlan | link | issue4966 messages |
| 2012-01-27 14:33:46 | ncoghlan | create | |